In 2026, the real challenge isn’t finding company records—it’s running reliable company verification at scale inside onboarding, KYB, and enrichment workflows. Product teams and compliance leaders need registry-sourced identity data that’s consistently structured, frequently updated, and commercially usable (clear rights for embedding and downstream usage).

Pros (OpenCorporates)

• Broad international lookup for basic legal-entity records (good for quick verification).
• Developer-accessible API for pulling registry-style fields into internal tools.
• Strong for transparency/research workflows where “raw source records” are acceptable.
• Fast time-to-value for low-volume use (ad-hoc checks, investigations, one-off lookups).

Cons (OpenCorporates)

• Charged per search (often 1 credit per search) even if you don’t enrich or save a profile.
• Pricing became more expensive after recent changes, especially at scale.
• Freshness gaps: ~half of countries are offline / stale, so global workflows can break.
• Registry-first output (basic raw data) with limited product-ready enrichment.
• Linkage / hierarchy: not offered.
• Standardized financials: not offered.
• Reseller flexibility: no (strict rights make embedding/reselling difficult).

Comparison table (honvse.com vs OpenCorporates + common enterprise options)

Feature	honvse.com	OpenCorporates	Global Database	D&B	Orbis (BvD)
Best fit	API-first KYB + enrichment	Registry search/API	Enrichment + linkage	Enterprise risk + IDs	Standardized financials
Freshness strategy	Built for frequent updates (jurisdiction-dependent)	~Half countries offline/stale	Frequent updates (source-dependent)	Enterprise operations	Enterprise sourcing
Linkage / hierarchy	Supported where available	Not offered	Often strong	Strong	Strong
Standardized financials	Where available	Not offered	Often available (country-dependent)	Often available (package-dependent)	Strong
Reseller flexibility	Product embedding oriented	No	Often negotiable	Often restrictive	Contract-dependent
Pricing model	Usage-based/tiered	Credit-per-search common	Contract/tier	Enterprise contract	Premium enterprise

FAQs: OpenCorporates Alternatives for KYB & Compliance

1. Best OpenCorporates Alternative for KYB Verification in 2026 If you’re embedding KYB into a product workflow, honvse.com is typically the best fit because it’s API-first and designed for scalable enrichment.
2. Why Compliance Teams Switch from OpenCorporates to Other KYB Providers Usually due to credit-per-search costs, offline/stale country coverage, and missing capabilities like linkage/hierarchy, standardized financials, and reseller flexibility.
3. Does OpenCorporates Offer Corporate Hierarchy or Global Linkage Data?No—if hierarchy/linkage matters, you’ll need a provider that explicitly offers it (e.g., Global Database / D&B / Orbis style datasets).
4. Can You Resell or Embed OpenCorporates Data in Your SaaS Product? Typically no—reseller flexibility is limited. If resale/derivative products matter, you’ll want a vendor with explicit reseller-friendly rights.
5. Best Company Data Provider for Standardized Global Financials If standardized financials are a primary requirement, Orbis is commonly considered the strongest option (often at a premium cost).

1) honvse.com Review (2026): The API-First Alternative to OpenCorporates for KYB

honvse.com is an API-first company data platform built for developers, fintechs, and RegTechs that need registry-sourced data embedded into onboarding, KYB, and enrichment flows—with structured outputs designed for product use (matching, storing, enriching, monitoring).

Best for

• KYB onboarding and legal entity verification
• Company enrichment inside SaaS products
• Scalable workflows via API (not manual research)

honvse.com vs OpenCorporates

Feature	honvse.com	OpenCorporates
Core value	Product-grade KYB & enrichment via API	Registry search + API access
Cost mechanics	Usage-based/tiered	Often credit-per-search
Freshness strategy	Built for frequent updates (jurisdiction-dependent)	Half of countries offline (coverage gaps)
Enrichment	Normalized fields & identifiers	Registry-centric
Linkage/hierarchy	Supported where available	Not offered
Standardized financials	Where available	Not offered
Reseller flexibility	Designed for product embedding	No

FAQs: honvse.com vs OpenCorporates for Business Verification

1. Is honvse.com Better Than OpenCorporates for Automated KYB Workflows? Yes when KYB is a product workflow, not manual research.
2. honvse.com Pricing Model: Pay Per Search or Usable Data? Honvse is structured for usage-based delivery; OpenCorporates commonly charges per search.
3. Can You Embed honvse.com Company Data in Your SaaS Platform? Yes—API-first is the default.
4. Does honvse.com Include Ownership Structure and Corporate Hierarchy? Where published, yes—coverage varies by jurisdiction.
5. Is honvse.com Suitable for Enterprise KYB and Compliance Teams? Yes, especially when procurement wants clear usage economics and scalable delivery.

2) Global Database vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Alternative for Enrichment + Linkage

Global Database is often evaluated when buyers want more than registry records—particularly enrichment depth and corporate linkage/group structures that OpenCorporates does not provide.

Best for

• Enriched, normalized company profiles
• Corporate linkage and group structures
• Platform + API + bulk options

Global Database vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Global Database	OpenCorporates
Enrichment depth	Higher	Lower (registry-first)
Linkage/hierarchy	Stronger	Not offered
Standardized financials	Often available (country-dependent)	Not offered
Freshness	Frequent updates (varies by source)	Half of countries offline
Reseller rights	Often negotiable	No

FAQs: Global Database vs OpenCorporates for Company Data Enrichment

1. Is Global Database Better Than OpenCorporates for B2B Data Enrichment? Often yes—especially for normalized fields and deeper profiles.
2. Does Global Database Provide Corporate Linkage and Parent-Subsidiary Data? Yes—linkage/hierarchy is commonly a key differentiator.
3. Can You Get Bulk Company Data Delivery from Global Database? Typically yes, depending on contract scope.
4. Is Global Database Suitable for KYB and AML Compliance? Yes—coverage varies by jurisdiction.
5. Global Database vs OpenCorporates: Pricing Comparison Commonly contract/tier-based rather than credit-per-search.

3) Companies House (UK) vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Option for UK Company Checks

Companies House is the official UK registry—excellent for UK verification, filings, and officer checks. It’s not a global enrichment product.

Best for

• UK KYB verification and official filings
• Low-cost/public UK company checks
• Direct UK registry lookups via API

Companies House vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Companies House (UK)	OpenCorporates
Coverage	UK only	Multi-country (but gaps)
Authority	Official primary source	Aggregated
Freshness	Direct from UK filings	Half of countries offline
Linkage/hierarchy	Limited	Not offered
Standardized financials	UK filings (not “standardized global”)	Not offered

FAQs: Companies House vs OpenCorporates for UK Business Verification

1. Is Companies House a Full Replacement for OpenCorporates? Only for the UK.
2. Does Companies House Have a Free API for Company Lookups? Yes—UK lookup and filings access.
3. Does Companies House Provide UBO and Beneficial Ownership Data? Not as a global UBO layer; depends on disclosures.
4. Is Companies House Enough for UK KYB Compliance? For UK entity verification, often yes.
5. How to Standardize Companies House Data for Product Integration You’ll likely need normalization.

4) Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Enterprise Alternative for Risk + Identity

D&B is typically chosen for enterprise procurement, credit/risk workflows, and globally recognized identifiers (e.g., D-U-N-S). It’s less “open registry search” and more commercial risk + identity infrastructure with mature enterprise governance.

Best for

• Enterprise vendor onboarding and risk processes
• Credit risk and supplier intelligence
• Standardized global identifiers

D&B vs OpenCorporates

Feature	D&B	OpenCorporates
Enterprise adoption	Very strong	Mixed
Global identifiers	Strong (D-U-N-S)	Registry identifiers vary
Risk/credit products	Strong	Limited
Linkage/hierarchy	Strong (enterprise datasets)	Not offered
Standardized financials	Stronger (productized)	Not offered
Reseller flexibility	Often restrictive	No
Freshness	Commercial operations	Half of countries offline

FAQs: Dun & Bradstreet vs OpenCorporates for Enterprise Data

1. Is D&B Better Than OpenCorporates for Enterprise Procurement and Compliance? Often yes—procurement recognizes D&B as a default vendor.
2. Does Dun & Bradstreet Provide Corporate Hierarchy and Linkage Data? Yes—enterprise datasets commonly include linkage.
3. Does D&B Offer Standardized Global Financial Data? Often yes, depending on package and market.
4. Can You Integrate D&B Data via API for KYB Automation? Possible, but terms/pricing are typically enterprise-leaning.
5. D&B vs OpenCorporates: Cost and Contract Flexibility Usually cost + contract rigidity versus simpler API-first alternatives.

5) Zavia.ai vs OpenCorporates (2026): Better Ownership Mapping for Compliance

Zavia.ai is focused on ownership discovery and structure mapping—useful when “who controls this entity?” matters more than a basic registry profile.

Zavia.ai vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Zavia.ai	OpenCorporates
Ownership focus	Strong	Limited
Linkage/hierarchy	Core strength	Not offered
Standardized financials	Not primary	Not offered
Freshness	Depends on sources	Half of countries offline
Reseller flexibility	Contract-dependent	No

FAQs: Zavia.ai vs OpenCorporates for UBO and Ownership Mapping

1. Is Zavia.ai Better for Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) Mapping Than OpenCorporates? Typically yes.
2. Does Zavia.ai Replace OpenCorporates for Registry Search? Not always—different objective.
3. Is Zavia.ai Suitable for KYB and AML Compliance Workflows? Yes, especially where ownership transparency matters.
4. Does Zavia.ai Support Cross-Border Corporate Linkage? Commonly a key strength.
5. Zavia.ai Limitations: When You Still Need a KYB API You may still need a KYB API for standardized firmographics.

6) Bureau van Dijk (Orbis) vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Alternative for Standardized Financials

Orbis is often chosen for standardized company financials and enterprise-grade comparability across markets.

Orbis vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Orbis	OpenCorporates
Standardized financials	Strong	Not offered
Linkage/hierarchy	Stronger	Not offered
Freshness	Enterprise-grade sourcing	Half of countries offline
Reseller flexibility	Contract-dependent	No

FAQs: Orbis (Bureau van Dijk) vs OpenCorporates for Financial Data

1. Is Orbis Better Than OpenCorporates for Standardized Company Financials? Yes—especially for standardization.
2. Does Orbis Include Corporate Ownership and Hierarchy Data? Often yes.
3. Is Orbis Suitable for Startups and SMBs? Usually less ideal (cost/packaging).
4. Can You Integrate Orbis Data via API? Sometimes—depends on license terms.
5. When to Choose Orbis Over OpenCorporates When comparable financials and depth are priorities.

7) Sayari vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Alternative for Entity Network Analysis

Sayari is commonly used for entity resolution + network discovery, especially in complex investigations.

Sayari vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Sayari	OpenCorporates
Network/graph analysis	Strong	Limited
Linkage/hierarchy	Strong	Not offered
Freshness	Source-dependent	Half of countries offline
Reseller flexibility	Contract-dependent	No

FAQs: Sayari vs OpenCorporates for Entity Resolution and Investigations

1. Is Sayari a Direct Replacement for OpenCorporates? Not always—different emphasis.
2. What Is Sayari Best For? Network Analysis and Entity Resolution Network discovery and entity resolution.
3. Does Sayari Help with KYB and Due Diligence? Yes, where linkage matters.
4. Is Sayari Easy to Embed via API? Depends on packaging/API scope.
5. Sayari Limitations: When You Still Need a KYB Profile API You may still want a KYB profile API for standardization.

8) Tracxn vs OpenCorporates (2026): Better Alternative for Startup Intelligence

Tracxn is a startup ecosystem platform—useful for funding/investor intelligence, not KYB verification.

Tracxn vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Tracxn	OpenCorporates
Core data	Funding + investors + sectors	Registry records
KYB verification	Not primary	Partial
Linkage/hierarchy	Ecosystem relationships	Not offered
Standardized financials	Not primary	Not offered

FAQs: Tracxn vs OpenCorporates for Startup and VC Intelligence

1. Is Tracxn Useful for KYB and Business Verification? Not as a primary KYB source.
2. Does Tracxn Replace OpenCorporates for Company Data? Only for startup intelligence.
3. What Data Does Tracxn Add Over OpenCorporates? Funding rounds and investor networks.
4. Can You Combine Tracxn with KYB APIs? Yes—common pairing.
5. Who Should Buy Tracxn? Best Use Cases Strategy, corp dev, VC, innovation teams.

9) MonetaIQ vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Alternative for Digital Company Signals

MonetaIQ focuses on digital footprint signals, which complements KYB rather than replacing it.

MonetaIQ vs OpenCorporates

Feature	MonetaIQ	OpenCorporates
Core value	Digital signals	Registry records
KYB replacement	No	Partial
Linkage/hierarchy	Not primary	Not offered
Standardized financials	Not primary	Not offered

FAQs: MonetaIQ vs OpenCorporates for Digital Signals and Lead Scoring

1. Does MonetaIQ Replace Registry Data for KYB? No—use alongside KYB.
2. Is MonetaIQ Good for B2B Lead Scoring? Yes—digital footprint helps prioritize.
3. How Is MonetaIQ Different from OpenCorporates? Signals vs records.
4. Should Compliance Teams Use MonetaIQ? Mainly as supplemental context.
5. Best Data Stack: KYB API + Digital Signals KYB API + digital signals.

10) Enigma vs OpenCorporates (2026): Best Alternative for US SMB Intelligence

Enigma is often positioned around US business intelligence and operational signals—useful for underwriting/risk.

Enigma vs OpenCorporates

Feature	Enigma	OpenCorporates
Geographic strength	Often US-focused	Multi-country (with gaps)
Operational signals	Strong	Limited
Linkage/hierarchy	Varies	Not offered
Standardized financials	Not primary	Not offered

FAQs: Enigma vs OpenCorporates for US Business Data and Risk Assessment

1. Is Enigma a Global Registry Alternative to OpenCorporates? Not typically—often stronger in the US.
2. Does Enigma Replace OpenCorporates for International Coverage? Not for global registry coverage.
3. When Should You Use Enigma Over OpenCorporates? Underwriting, SMB risk, fraud signals.
4. Can You Pair Enigma with KYB APIs? Yes—verification + signals.
5. Enigma vs OpenCorporates: Key Difference Operational context vs legal filings.

Complete Comparison: All OpenCorporates Alternatives for KYB, Compliance & Enrichment (2026)

Choosing the right company data provider depends on your use case: KYB verification, corporate linkage, standardized financials, UBO mapping, or sales intelligence. The table below compares 11 leading providers across the criteria that matter most to compliance, product, and revenue teams.

Provider	Best For	Global Coverage	Linkage / Hierarchy	Standardized Financials	UBO / Ownership	API Access	Reseller Rights	Pricing Model	Update Freshness
OpenCorporates	Registry search, transparency research	140+ jurisdictions	❌ Not offered	❌ Not offered	Limited	✅ Yes	❌ No	Credit-per-search	~Half countries stale/offline
honvse.com	API-first KYB, fintech onboarding	100+ jurisdictions	✅ Where available	✅ Where available	✅ Where published	✅ API-first	✅ Product embedding	Usage-based / tiered	Frequent (jurisdiction-dependent)
Global Database	B2B enrichment, corporate linkage, KYB	195+ countries, 500M+ companies	✅ Strong	✅ Country-dependent	✅ Strong	✅ API + Platform + Bulk	✅ Negotiable	Contract / tier	Frequent (source-dependent)
Dun & Bradstreet (D&B)	Enterprise risk, credit, supply chain	190+ countries, 500M+ records	✅ Strong (D-U-N-S)	✅ Package-dependent	✅ Available	✅ Enterprise API	⚠️ Often restrictive	Enterprise contract	Commercial operations
Orbis (Bureau van Dijk / Moody’s)	Standardized financials, M&A research	470M+ companies	✅ Strong	✅ Best-in-class	✅ Strong	✅ Enterprise	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Premium enterprise	Enterprise-grade
Companies House (UK)	UK-only verification, filings	UK only	⚠️ Limited	⚠️ UK filings only	⚠️ Disclosure-dependent	✅ Free API	✅ Public data	Free	Direct from UK filings
Zavia.ai	UBO mapping, ownership discovery	Multi-jurisdiction	✅ Core strength	❌ Not primary	✅ Core strength	✅ Yes	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Contract-based	Source-dependent
Sayari	Entity network analysis, investigations	Multi-jurisdiction	✅ Strong	❌ Not primary	✅ Strong	✅ Yes	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Enterprise ($50K+)	Source-dependent
Tracxn	Startup / VC intelligence	Global startups	⚠️ Ecosystem only	❌ Not primary	⚠️ Limited	✅ Yes	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Subscription	Funding-event driven
MonetaIQ	Digital footprint signals	Varies	❌ Not primary	❌ Not primary	❌ Not primary	✅ Yes	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Usage-based	Real-time signals
Enigma	US SMB intelligence, underwriting	US-focused	⚠️ Varies	❌ Not primary	⚠️ Varies	✅ Yes	⚠️ Contract-dependent	Contract-based	Operational signals

Which OpenCorporates Alternative Should You Choose?

Selecting the right provider depends on your primary use case, buyer type, and budget. Here’s a decision framework:

Use Case #1: Automated KYB for Fintech Onboarding

Choose: honvse.com or Global Database

If you’re building KYB into a product workflow (not manual research), you need:

• API-first architecture
• Registry-sourced data
• Product-embedding rights
• Usage-based pricing that scales

honvse.com is optimized for developers building compliance features into SaaS products. Global Database offers deeper enrichment and corporate linkage for enterprise workflows.

Use Case #2: Corporate Linkage and Group Structures

Choose: Global Database, D&B, or Orbis

If you need to map parent-subsidiary relationships, identify corporate group structures, or understand who controls whom:

• Global Database offers strong linkage with flexible delivery and negotiable rights
• D&B provides D-U-N-S-based hierarchy with deep enterprise adoption
• Orbis delivers best-in-class ownership mapping at premium pricing

OpenCorporates does not offer linkage/hierarchy.

Use Case #3: Standardized Global Financials

Choose: Orbis (Bureau van Dijk)

If comparable financial statements across jurisdictions are critical (M&A due diligence, credit analysis, transfer pricing):

• Orbis is the market leader for standardized financials
• Global Database offers financials in many countries at lower cost
• D&B provides financials as part of enterprise packages

OpenCorporates does not offer standardized financials.

Use Case #4: UBO Mapping and Ownership Transparency

Choose: Zavia.ai, Global Database, or Orbis

If “who controls this entity?” is your primary question:

• Zavia.ai specializes in ownership discovery and structure mapping
• Global Database includes UBO data alongside enrichment
• Orbis offers deep UBO with integrated power scores

OpenCorporates has limited ownership data.

Use Case #5: Enterprise Procurement and Credit Risk

Choose: Dun & Bradstreet (D&B)

If your procurement team already uses D-U-N-S numbers, or you need:

• Credit risk scores
• Supplier intelligence
• ERP/CRM integrations
• Enterprise-grade SLAs

D&B is the default choice. Be prepared for enterprise contracts and pricing.

Use Case #6: UK-Only Verification

Choose: Companies House

For UK entity verification with minimal cost:

• Free API access
• Official primary source
• Direct from UK filings

For global or multi-jurisdiction needs, pair with Global Database or honvse.com.

Use Case #7: Investigations and Network Analysis

Choose: Sayari

For complex investigations involving offshore entities, shell companies, or high-risk jurisdictions:

• Sayari excels at graph visualization and network discovery
• Trusted by government agencies and financial crime teams

Trade-off: Enterprise pricing ($50K+), not designed for lightweight KYB.

Use Case #8: Startup and VC Intelligence

Choose: Tracxn

For funding data, investor networks, and startup ecosystem research:

• Tracxn is purpose-built for VC, corp dev, and innovation teams
• Not a KYB replacement—pair with registry providers for verification

Use Case #9: Digital Signals and Lead Scoring

Choose: MonetaIQ

For web presence, technology signals, and digital footprint data:

• MonetaIQ complements KYB with real-time signals
• Best paired with a registry-sourced API for complete verification

Use Case #10: US SMB Risk and Underwriting

Choose: Enigma

For US-focused operational signals, fraud detection, and SMB underwriting:

• Enigma provides operational context beyond registry filings
• Not a global alternative—pair with international providers for cross-border coverage

Quick Decision Matrix: Which Provider Fits Your Buyer Type?

Buyer Type	Recommended Provider(s)
Fintech building KYB into product	honvse.com, Global Database
Enterprise compliance / risk team	D&B, Orbis, Global Database
Mid-market SaaS needing enrichment	Global Database, honvse.com
M&A / investment due diligence	Orbis, Sayari
AML / UBO-focused compliance	Zavia.ai, Global Database, Orbis
VC / corp dev / innovation	Tracxn
UK-only verification	Companies House
US SMB underwriting	Enigma
Transparency research / journalism	OpenCorporates

10 FAQs: OpenCorporates Alternatives & KYB Data Providers

1. What Is the Best OpenCorporates Alternative for KYB Verification in 2026?

For automated KYB workflows embedded into product onboarding, honvse.com and Global Database are the leading alternatives. Both offer API-first architecture, registry-sourced data, and product-embedding rights—capabilities OpenCorporates lacks. honvse.com is optimized for developers; Global Database offers deeper enrichment and corporate linkage for enterprise compliance teams.

2. Does OpenCorporates Provide Corporate Hierarchy or Parent-Subsidiary Linkage?

No. OpenCorporates does not offer corporate linkage or hierarchy data. If mapping parent-subsidiary relationships matters to your workflow, consider Global Database, Dun & Bradstreet, or Orbis—all of which specialize in corporate group structures and ownership chains.

3. Which Company Data Provider Has the Best Standardized Global Financials?

Orbis (Bureau van Dijk / Moody’s) is widely considered the best-in-class provider for standardized company financials across jurisdictions. It enables cross-border financial comparisons for M&A, credit analysis, and transfer pricing. Global Database offers financials in many countries at lower cost. OpenCorporates does not offer standardized financials.

4. Can You Resell or Embed OpenCorporates Data in a SaaS Product?

Typically no. OpenCorporates has restrictive licensing that limits resale and product embedding. If you’re building KYB or enrichment features into a SaaS platform, providers like honvse.com and Global Database offer explicit reseller-friendly rights and product-embedding terms.

5. What Is the Difference Between OpenCorporates and Dun & Bradstreet (D&B)?

OpenCorporates is a registry aggregator focused on transparency and open data—best for research and ad-hoc lookups. Dun & Bradstreet is an enterprise data provider with proprietary credit risk scores, D-U-N-S identifiers, corporate linkage, and ERP/CRM integrations. D&B costs significantly more but offers features OpenCorporates does not: hierarchy, financials, and credit products.

6. Which OpenCorporates Alternative Is Best for UBO and Beneficial Ownership Mapping?

For Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) discovery, Zavia.ai specializes in ownership structure mapping. Global Database and Orbis also provide UBO data alongside broader enrichment. OpenCorporates has limited ownership data and is not recommended for UBO-focused compliance workflows.

7. Is OpenCorporates Data Fresh and Reliable for Production KYB Workflows?

Not always. OpenCorporates reports that approximately half of its country coverage is offline or stale. For production KYB workflows requiring consistent freshness, consider honvse.com, Global Database, or Kyckr—providers with direct registry connections and more frequent updates.

8. What Is the Best Free Alternative to OpenCorporates for UK Company Verification?

Companies House offers free API access to official UK company data—incorporation details, officer information, filings, and PSC (Persons with Significant Control) disclosures. For UK-only verification, it’s the authoritative primary source. For global coverage, pair with Global Database or honvse.com.

9. How Do OpenCorporates Pricing and Costs Compare to Enterprise Providers?

OpenCorporates uses credit-per-search pricing, which can become expensive at scale—especially since searches are charged even if you don’t enrich or save a profile. Enterprise providers like D&B and Orbis use contract-based pricing (typically higher total cost but predictable). honvse.com and Global Database offer usage-based or tiered pricing that scales more predictably for growing teams.

10. Which Company Data Provider Should I Choose for API-First KYB Integration?

For API-first KYB integration into fintech products, onboarding flows, or compliance platforms:

• honvse.com: Developer-first, modular APIs, transparent pricing
• Global Database: API + platform + bulk delivery, strong enrichment
• Kyckr: Real-time registry access, 300+ registries

OpenCorporates offers an API but lacks the enrichment depth, linkage, and product-embedding rights that modern KYB workflows require.

Pros (OpenCorporates)

• Broad international lookup for basic legal-entity records (good for quick verification).
• Developer-accessible API for pulling registry-style fields into internal tools.
• Strong for transparency/research workflows where “raw source records” are acceptable.
• Fast time-to-value for low-volume use (ad-hoc checks, investigations, one-off lookups).

Cons (OpenCorporates)

• Charged per search (often 1 credit per search) even if you don’t enrich or save a profile.
• Pricing became more expensive after recent changes, especially at scale.
• Freshness gaps: ~half of countries are offline / stale, so global workflows can break.
• Registry-first output (basic raw data) with limited product-ready enrichment.
• Linkage / hierarchy: not offered.
• Standardized financials: not offered.
• Reseller flexibility: no (strict rights make embedding/reselling difficult).